Curse

Lynnrose · Nov 09, 2005, 08:23 PM // 20:23

I don't care about the weapon type, damage, req, etc. -- I just want a one-handed weapon with -5 (or higher) energy and a focus item with as much negative energy (but not negative health or any health/energy degen) as possible. Please PM me with anything you have and what you want for it.

Edit to add: Perhaps I should have been more clear. I want junk items that have as little value/cost as possible. I don't care if it's a 5-7 damage earth wand dropped by a lvl 3 elemental in Ascalon -- the important thing is the negative energy. I am willing, though, to pay enough to make it worth your time to deliver the item to me.

Knight of Saitin · Nov 09, 2005, 09:00 PM // 21:00

I have an axe and a bow for sale here that have -5 energy....take a peek.
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=77583

Drs499m · Nov 09, 2005, 09:43 PM // 21:43

I've got 2x swords here. http://guildwarsguru.com/forum/showthread.php?t=77075

Lynnrose · Nov 16, 2005, 05:38 PM // 17:38

*bump*

Lynnrose · Nov 17, 2005, 05:41 PM // 17:41

*bump*

wheel · Nov 17, 2005, 06:26 PM // 18:26

the only negative energy offhand items you'll find are most likely from presear with +3 energy, +4-5 armor, -5 energy, for a net effect of -2 energy. and btw, for those of you who are posting up your expensive weapons. i'm quite sure that the author does not care about damage or stats of the weapon at all, just that it has -5 energy and no negative side effects.

wiz12268 · Nov 18, 2005, 01:32 AM // 01:32

***sorry sold it***

Lynnrose · Nov 18, 2005, 05:26 PM // 17:26

*bump*

Wow, wiz, sorry I wasn't able to take advantage of that four-minute window of opportunity you provided.

Wheel, you're right. I have a -2 net energy icon now, but am hoping a better one will surface. As far as the weapon, right again. I don't care about anything other than -5 energy with no other drawbacks.

edit to add (I'm not sure if the bumping rule applies here, so I'm not going to chance it): I was operating under that assumption, too. Thanks for confirming it. I think my item (which was a drop from post-sear Ascalon) has +5 armor and -2 net energy. It's in my storage and travels with my PvP monk builds. It is like the one you described (higher than three energy, but with a req), which means it has a -2 net loss (even if you don't meet the req, you still get the minimum amount of energy). Now if I can just find a cheap -5 sword/axe . . . .

wheel · Nov 18, 2005, 09:16 PM // 21:16

i spoke to charles ensign about it and he said that the most negative energy you could have on a focus was -2, because the minimum energy bonus that a focus can have is +3, and the negative energy bonus can only be -5. of course, you might be able to find a +5 armor mod versus a +4 armor mod. then again, you might even be able to find a focus from farming low level eles in post-sear ascalon that give a mod something like this:

+6 energy (req: 3 earth magic)
+5 armor
-5 energy

for a net energy loss of -5. i dont know if they exist because i've never seen one, but i would pay quite a sum of money for an extra -3 energy.

Lynnrose · Nov 19, 2005, 06:43 PM // 18:43

*bump* Anyone? Please?

Lynnrose · Nov 20, 2005, 07:23 PM // 19:23

*yet another bump*

dreamex2 · Nov 21, 2005, 02:48 PM // 14:48

Not sure if this is what you're looking for...

Jeweled Chakram (req11<--- I think, illusion)
12 Energy
+5 Armor
-5 energy
+22 Health Always.

It makes a fair energy shield, but the +12 energy base would not work well if you meet the requirement for illusion...

Sereng Amaranth · Nov 23, 2005, 11:11 AM // 11:11

May I ask why you want less energy?

dreamex2 · Nov 23, 2005, 02:09 PM // 14:09

Protects your energy pool from being drained in PvP and certain PvE Situations.

Arya Nibelrund · Nov 23, 2005, 02:23 PM // 14:23

Regarding offhands, they don't only drop in presear... i found a blood necro item in UW with -5 energy +5 armor vs all and +28hp always req. 8....
I'm still looking for a price check on Etc forums before I sell it though

dreamex2 · Nov 23, 2005, 02:25 PM // 14:25

Yea, sounds like mine posted above except nicer